
Over the past 26 years, both technology and the financial landscape have evolved dramatically. On July 31, 2025, the U.S. House Financial Services Committee requested public feedback on issues that could shape the first major update to financial privacy laws in more than two decades. The inquiry centers on the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA).
As digital banking, data sharing, and artificial intelligence reshape how financial institutions interact with consumers, lawmakers are reassessing whether the GLBA’s framework for safeguarding personal information remains adequate in today’s environment.
In order to determine the next steps when it comes to possible reform, Congressional leaders had interested members of the public send their comments related to a list of questions. Below are just a few that were asked for public opinion.
Revising the GLBA is a step in the right direction, but it may not go far enough. A comprehensive federal privacy law could join protections across industries and states, creating consistency nationwide. Lawmakers have yet to achieve this goal, despite years of proposals and debate.
The main sticking point is whether a federal law should override state privacy laws. A single national standard could make things simpler for businesses and more consistent for consumers. However, it could also weaken the stronger privacy protections that many states already have. Reducing consumer privacy rights seems unwise at a time when new technologies are raising more concerns about how personal data is used.
Expanding what counts as “personal financial information” to include digital details — like someone’s IP address, location, or online activity — would better protect consumers and bring the GLBA up to modern times. This would also reduce the need for states to step in with their own privacy laws.
Revising these terms to match how people use financial services today would make the law apply fairly to both credit unions and newer fintech companies. It would also strengthen privacy by giving the same protection to all kinds of personal data.
With fintech apps and data aggregators now handling more sensitive financial information, including them under GLBA’s Title V would help cover gaps in the law and ensure all companies protect consumer data consistently.
Comments were due to the U.S. House Financial Services Committee by August 28, 2025. To see the whole list of questions presented, check out the news article.
Keep an eye out for possible updates in the future.
Have questions or want to know more? Contact ViClarity’s compliance services team at compliancesupport@viclarityus.com.
(Authored by ViClarity)
For more information, email Heather Line.
Your League-member benefits include the Compliance Hotline — providing exclusive access to dedicated compliance experts:
Using the above phone number and email address, you can gain access to a knowledgeable team that’s ready to address all your credit union’s compliance inquiries — promptly and efficiently. With the Compliance Hotline, you can proactively respond to impromptu questions and issues by getting clarity and insight on technical topics that normally slow you down. We want to help you unlock the full potential of your League membership by leveraging the resources and support you need to navigate the complex world of compliance effortlessly. We’re ALWAYS just a phone call or email away!
Additionally, other League-member compliance resources include:
Powered by ViClarity, a California’s Credit Unions and Nevada’s Credit Unions company.
2855 East Guasti Rd., Suite 202
Ontario, CA 91761
909.212.6000
1201 K. St., Suite 1050
Sacramento, CA 95814-3992
916.325.1360
c/o Silver State Schools CU
630 Trade Center Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89119
202.638.5777 www.cuna.org
www.dfpi.ca.gov
Clothilde “Cloey” V. Hewlett — 415.263.8500
fid.state.nv.us
702.486.4120 (Las Vegas)
775.684.2970 (Carson City)